Validasi Model Turbulensi pada Simulasi Numerik Menggunakan Software Fluent dengan Sayap Onera M6

Abstract

Abstract

Numerical simulation using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method is one way of predicting airflow characteristics on the model. This method is widely used because it is relatively inexpensive and faster in getting desired results compared with performing direct testing. The correctness of a computational simulation output is highly dependent on the input and how it was processed. In this paper, simulation is done on Onera M6 Wing, to investigate the effect of a turbulence model’s application on the accuracy of the computational result. The choice of Onera M6 Wing as a simulation’s model is due to its extensive database of testing results from various wind tunnels in the world. Among Turbulence models used are Spalart-Allmaras, K-Epsilon, K-Omega, and SST.


Keywords: CFD, fluent, Model, Turbulence, Onera M6, Spalart-Allmaras, K-Epsilon, K-Omega, SST.


Abstraks

Simulasi numerik dengan menggunakan metode Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) merupakan salah satu cara untuk memprediksi karakteristik suatu aliran udara yang terjadi pada model. Metode ini banyak digunakan karena sifatnya yang relatif murah dan cepat untuk mendapatkan hasil dibandingkan dengan melakukan pengujian langsung. Benar tidak hasil sebuah simulasi komputasi sangat tergantung pada inputan yang diberikan serta cara memproses data inputan tersebut. Pada tulisan ini dilakukan simulasi dengan menggunakan sayap onera M6 dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penggunaan model turbulensi terhadap keakuratan hasil komputasi. Pilihan sayap onera M6 sebagai model simulasi dikarenakan model tersebut sudah memiliki database hasil pengujian yang cukup lengkap dan sudah divalidasi dari berbagai terowongan angin di dunia. Model turbulensi yang digunakan diantaranya Spalart-Allmaras, K-Epsilon, K-Omega dan SST.


Kata Kunci : CFD, fluent, Model, Turbulensi, Onera M6, Spalart-Allmaras, K-Epsilon, K-Omega, SST.


https://doi.org/10.29122/joat.v2i1.3817
PDF

References

Anderson, J. D. 1995. “Computation Fluid Dynamic Basic With Applicationâ€. USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Fluent 6.3.26, 2006,†Flow Modeling Softwareâ€. Fluent Inc

Tuakia, F. 2008. “Dasar-Dasar CFD Menggunakan FLUENT†. Bandung: Informatika.

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/valid/m6wing/m6wing.html

Fluent Theory Guide, 2006. Fluent, Inc.

Spalart, P. R., Jou W-H., Strelets M., Allmaras, S. R., “Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings and on a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach†Advances in DNS/LES, 1st AFOSR Int. Conf. on DNS/LES, Greyden Press, Columbus Oh, 4-8 August, 1997

Patel, R. and Ramani, S. 2015. “Determination of Optimum Domain Size for 3D Numerical Simulation in ANSYS CFXâ€. IJIRSET Vol. 4, Issue 6, June 2015

Schmitt, V. and Charpin, F., "Pressure Distributions on the ONERA-M6-Wing at Transonic Mach Numbers," Experimental Data Base for Computer Program Assessmentâ€. Report of the Fluid Dynamics Panel Working Group 04, AGARD AR-138, May 1979

Naveed Durrani and Ning Qin. Comparison of RANS, DES and DDES results for ONERA M-6 Wing at transonic flow speed using an in-house parallel code. 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 4 - 7 January 2011, Orlando, Florida.