EVALUASI ERGONOMI KOKPIT PESAWAT UDARA N-219 DENGAN USABILITY TESTING

Authors

  • Triyono Widi Sasongko PTSPT-TIRBR-BPPT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29122/mipi.v11i3.2580

Abstract

Abstrak

Analisis optimalisasi ergonomi kokpit pesawat udara N-219 sangat penting untuk dilakukan, dikarenakan postur tubuh yang kaku disebabkan oleh konfigurasi kokpit yang kurang baik membuat pilot merasa tidak nyaman, lelah yang akan menyalahi keamanan penerbangan dan berbahaya bagi pilot.

Hasil survey pengukuran ergonomic kognitif dengan metode pengukuran usability dengan Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS), yang meliputi reaksi aircrew terhadap keseluruhan sIstem, display, teknologi sIstem informasi, pembelajaran dan kapabilitas sIstem di kokpit N-219 mempunyai nilai pada skala 7,32 s/d 8,19, dengan kategori baik dan bisa diterima, meskipun terdapat beberapa kekurangan yang harus diperbaiki.

Dalam pengembangan selanjutnya, kokpit perlu didesain untuk bisa mengakomodasi pilot yang memiliki tubuh di atas rata-rata karena secara umum sistem yang berjalan saat ini masih kurang nyaman bagi pilot yang memiliki persentil atas.

 Kata Kunci: ergonomi, kokpit N-219, usability test

 
 ABSTRACT

Analysis of optimization of the airplane's cockpit ergonomics N-219 is very important to do, due to the rigid posture caused by the uncomfortable of configuration of the cockpit that make pilots uneasy and tired. It is going to violate the security of the flight and dangerous for pilots.

The survey results of measurement with the method of measurement of cognitive ergonomic usability with a Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS), which includes reaction to the overall system, aircrew display systems technology, information, learning and capability systems in the cockpit N-219 has a value on a scale of 7.32 up to 8.19, by category which is good and acceptable, although there were some shortcomings that must be rectified.

In future development, cockpit needs to be designed to be able to accommodate the pilots who have above average of anthropometric because in general the system running at present still less convenient for pilots who have the top percentile.

 Keywords: cockpit ergonomics, N-219, usability test

References

Triyono Widi Sasongko, Nina Kartika, Tegar Septyan, Dimas Bahtera E, 2017, “Analisis Ergonomi Konfigurasi Kokpit Pesawat Udara N-219â€, Prosiding Seminar Perhimpunan Ergonomi Indonesia, Denpasar, Oktober 2017.

Nielsen, J, 1993, “Usability Engineeringâ€, Morgan Kaufmann

Lewis, J. 1994. “Sample Sizes for Usability Studies: Additional Considerationsâ€., Human Factors

Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T.1993, “A Mathematical Model of the Finding of Usability Problemsâ€, ACM Proceedings, Interchi 93, Amsterdam

Virzi, R. 1992, “Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects is Enoughy?â€, Human Factors

Tarwaka, Solichul HA.Bakri, Lilik Sudiajeng, 2004, “Ergonomi untuk Keselamatan, Kesehatan Kerja dan Produktivitasâ€, Uniba Press.

Kuswana, Wowo Sunaryo, 2016, “Ergonomi dan Kesehatan Keselamatan Kerja (K3)â€, Rosdakarya, Bandung.

International Civil Aviation Organization ‘Safety Report’ 2014 Edition.

Zhongsheng Wang, 2011, “Study of Evolution Mechanism on Aircraft sudden Failureâ€.

Zhang, Yanjun et al, 2013, “A Framework for Ergonomics Design of Transport Category Airplane Cockpitâ€, ISAA, Procedia Engineering.

Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource (CAESAR) Final Report, Volume I: Summary, Juni 2012.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-18