Perencanaan Drainase Berbasis Eco-Technology ditinjau dari Migrasi Ular (Studi Kasus: Suaka Rhino Sumatera, Taman Nasional Way Kambas)

Main Article Content

Ahmad Herison
Yuda Romdania
Endro Prasetyo Wahono
Muhammad Yusrizal Fahri

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Way Kambas National Park (TNWK) is one of the conservation areas in Lampung Province. The National Park functions to protect, preserve various kinds of animals and conservation. Design based on Eco-Technology is an absolute requirement for the sustainability of the region. This study aims to plan Eco-Technology-based drainage from road construction in the Sumatra Rhino Sanctuary (SRS), Way Kambas National Park, with snake objects. Every infrastructure development, such as drainage, must pay attention to the lives of wild animals such as snakes. Planning starts with calculating hydrological analysis to produce a debit plan with a rational method. Analysis of snake migration is done to determine the behavior and migration of snakes. Based on the calculation results there is no flood point from the planning of cross-section D1-D8 with the width of the channel width (b) = 20 cm, water depth (h) = 14.47 cm, peak width (B) = 220 cm, cross-section = 10° and cross-section material used is soil. With the drainage concept, the migration of snakes from one span to another is not disturbed to maintain the balance of the natural ecosystem. The conclusion is that the drainage design obtained is getting sloping, so the drainage conditions are better and friendly to snakes.

Keywords: Eco-Technology, drainage, conservation, Way Kambas National Park, snake migration

ABSTRAK

Taman Nasional Way Kambas (TNWK) merupakan satu diantara kawasan konservasi yang berada di Provinsi Lampung. Taman Nasional berfungsi untuk melindungi, melestarikan berbagai macam satwa dan konservasi. Desain yang berbasis Eco-Technology merupakan syarat mutlak untuk keberlanjutan kawasan itu. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merencanakan drainase berbasis Eco-Technology dari suatu pembangunan jalan di Suaka Rhino Sumatera (SRS), Taman Nasional Way Kambas dengan objek ular. Setiap pembangunan Infrastruktur seperti drainase harus memperhatikan kehidupan satwa liar seperti ular. Perencanaan dimulai dengan melakukan perhitungan analisis hidrologi untuk dapat menghasilkan debit rencana dengan metode rasional. Analisis migrasi ular dilakukan untuk mengetahui perilaku dan migrasi ular. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan tidak terdapat titik banjir dari perencanaan penampang D1-D8 dengan ukuran lebar dasar saluran (b) = 20 cm, kedalaman air (h) = 14,47 cm, lebar puncak (B) = 220 cm, kemiringan penampang = 10° dan bahan penampang yang digunakan adalah tanah. Dengan adanya konsep drainase tersebut, migrasi ular dari bentang satu ke bentang lainnya tidak terganggu sehingga dapat menjaga keseimbangan ekosistem alam. Kesimpulannya adalah desain drainase yang didapat makin landai, maka kondisi drainase makin baik dan ramah terhadap ular.

Kata kunci: Eco-Technology, drainase, konservasi, Taman Nasional Way Kambas, migrasi ular

Article Details

Section
RESEARCH ARTICLES
Author Biography

Ahmad Herison, Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty Lampung University, Ir Soemantri Brojonegoro Street, Lampung, Indonesia 35144 Email : (ahmadherison@yahoo.com )

ahmad herison is a lecturer majoring in civil engineering, faculty of engineering at university of lampung. research concentration on ecotourism, mangrove wave mitigation, eco design, feasibility study, sedimentation and coastal environment.

References

Bappenas. (1993). Biodiversity Action Plan for Indonesia. Final Draft.

Matlock, M. D., Osborn, G. S., Hession, W. C., Kenimer, A. L., & Storm, D. E. (2001). Ecological engineering: a rationale for standardized curriculum and professional certification in the United States. Ecological Engineering, 17(4), 403-409.

Mitsch, W.J., Jorgensen, S.E. (2003). Ecological Engineering and Ecosystem Restoration. Jhon Willey & Sons, Inc., New York, 411 pp.

Mitsch, W.J., (2012). What is Ecological Engineering. Ecol. Eng, 45, 5-12.

Odum, H. T., & Odum, B. (2003). Concepts and methods of ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering, 20(5), 339-361.

Yang, B., & Ming-Han, L. I. (2010). Ecological engineering in a new town development: Drainage design in The Woodlands, Texas. Ecological Engineering, 36(12), 1639-1650.

Bergen, S. D., Bolton, S. M., & Fridley, J. L. (2001). Design principles for ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering, 18(2), 201-210.

[IUCN]. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. (2008). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org [10 September 2017].

SK Dirjen No.SK.307/KSDAE-KKH/2016 tentang Penetapan Perluasan Area Kandang Badak Taman Nasional Way Kambas.

Republik Indonesia, (1990). Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1990 tentang Konservasi Sumberdaya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.

Brüll, A., van Bohemen, H., Costanza, R., Mitsch, W. J., van den Boomen, R., Chaudhuri, N., ... & Schönborn, A. (2011). Benefits of ecological engineering practices. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 9, 16-20.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 12/PRT/M/2014 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem Drainase Perkotaan