- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charge
- Plagiarsm Screening
- Grammar Checker
- References Management
Focus and Scope
Shipbuilding and Floating Structure Design Technology
Hydrodynamic Technology of Offshore Structures
Floating Structures and Shipping System Technology
Mechanics, electronics, automation: Instrumentation, Sensor Systems, Underwater Acoustics, Marine Vehicle Control
Planning & Management of Ports and Coastal Areas
Port Infrastructures and Coastal Structures Technology
Ocean Wave Mechanics, Extreme Waves/Tsunamis, and Other Water Related Disasters
Marine Renewable Energy Conversion Technology
Marine Numerical and Safety Analysis
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
Peer Review Process
Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim (Journal of Maritime Technology) implement a peer review process. All articles submitted to will be reviewed in a closed (blind review) by the Peer Reviewers. In general, each journal manuscript will be reviewed by two Peer Reviewers. If one of the two Peer Reviewers refuses to review the journal manuscript, the Editorial Board will find a replacement for another Peer Reviewer so that the number of Peer Reviewers for the journal manuscript remains 2 (two) people.
The responses from these reviewers will be used as the basis for the Editorial Board to determine whether an article can be accepted, revision required, resubmit for review or rejected. A journal manuscript is refused to be published due to various considerations, among the journal manuscripts are not in accordance with the scope of the journal, the scientific side of the article is inadequate to be classified in a scientific paper, a fundamental methodological mistake, or because the author refuses for improvement from Peer Reviewer suggestions.
The deadline of the paper submission for July publication is on 31th of May and for December publication is on 30th of November of each year.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Articles published in Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim (Journal of Maritime Technology) will be Open-Access articles distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Open Journal Systems supports the LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) system to ensure a secure and permanent archive for the journal. LOCKSS is open source software developed at Stanford University Library that enables libraries to preserve selected web journals by regularly polling registered journal websites for newly published content and archiving it. Each archive is continually validated against other library caches, and if content is found to be corrupted or lost, the other caches or the journal is used to restore it.. More...
Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim (Journal of Maritime Technology) is a journal aimed to be a leading peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information. We publish original research papers, review articles and case studies which have neither been published elsewhere in any language nor is it under review for publication anywhere. This following statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor, the reviewer, and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Duties of Authors
Reporting Standards: Authors should present an accurate account of the original research performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Researchers should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. A manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Manuscripts should follow the submission guidelines of the journal.
Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work. The manuscript should not be submitted concurrently to more than one publication unless the editors have agreed to co-publication. Relevant previous work and publications, both by other researchers and the authors’ own, should be properly acknowledged and referenced. The primary literature should be cited where possible. Original wording taken directly from publications by other researchers should appear in quotation marks with the appropriate citations.
Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications: Author should not in general submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. It is also expected that the author will not publish redundant manuscripts or manuscripts describing same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Multiple publications arising from a single research project should be clearly identified as such and the primary publication should be referenced.
Acknowledgement of Sources: Authors should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
Authorship of the Paper: The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. Others who have made a significant contribution must be listed as co-authors. In cases where major contributors are listed as authors while those who made less substantial, or purely technical, contributions to the research or to the publication are listed in an acknowledgement section. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should clearly disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental Errors in Published Works: If the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript, then the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: The author should clearly identify in the manuscript if the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use.
Duties of Editor
Publication Decisions: Based on the review report of the editorial board, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Editors have to take responsibility for everything they publish and should have procedures and policies in place to ensure the quality of the material they publish and maintain the integrity of the published record.
Review of Manuscripts: Editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. Editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.
Fair Play: The editor must ensure that each manuscript received by the journal is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to sex, gender, race, religion, citizenship, etc. of the authors. An important part of the responsibility to make fair and unbiased decisions is the upholding of the principle of editorial independence and integrity. Editors are in a powerful position by making decisions on publications, which makes it very important that this process is as fair and unbiased as possible.
Confidentiality: The editor must ensure that information regarding manuscripts submitted by the authors is kept confidential. Editors should critically assess any potential breaches of data protection and patient confidentiality. This includes requiring properly informed consent for the actual research presented, consent for publication where applicable.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: The editor of the Journal will not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for his own research without written consent of the author. Editors should not be involved in decisions about papers in which they have a conflict of interest.
Duties of Reviewers
Confidentiality: Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged information. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. The reviewers should notify the journal immediately if they come across any irregularities, have concerns about ethical aspects of the work, are aware of substantial similarity between the manuscript and a concurrent submission to another journal or a published article, or suspect that misconduct may have occurred during either the research or the writing and submission of the manuscript; reviewers should, however, keep their concerns confidential and not personally investigate further unless the journal asks for further information or advice.
Standards of Objectivity: Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewers should follow journals’ instructions on the specific feedback that is required of them and, unless there are good reasons not to. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. In the case of the double-blind review, if they suspect the identity of the author(s) notify the journal if this knowledge raises any potential conflict of interest.
Promptness: The reviewers should respond in a reasonable time-frame. The reviewers only agree to review a manuscript if they are fairly confident they can return a review within the proposed or mutually agreed time-frame, informing the journal promptly if they require an extension. In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him/her to complete review of the manuscript within stipulated time then this information must be communicated to the editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer.
Article Processing Charge
In an open-access model, the publication costs of an article are paid from an author's research budget, or by their supporting institution, in the form of Article Processing Charges. These Article Processing Charges replace subscription charges and allow publishers to make the full-text of every published article freely available to all interested readers. However, there is no charge for article submission.
For Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim (Journal of Maritime Technology) the fees to be paid upon the acceptance of an article are indicated in the table below:
- Article Submission Charges : 0,- (IDR)
Article Processing Charges : 0,- (IDR)
Article Publication Charges : 400.000,- (IDR)
Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim (Journal of Maritime Technology) checks the submitted journal manuscripts regarding the plagiarism of the manuscript using the PLAGIARSM CHECKER X software. Checks are carried out at the "Preliminary" stage by the Editorial Board. The percentage of plagiarism that has been determined by the Editorial Board is less than 20%. If the results of checking the similarity of the journal manuscripts are less than 20%, the process can be continued, if the results of checking the similarity of the journal manuscripts are more than 20%, then the journal manuscripts will be returned to the author/author to be corrected again the similarity of the manuscripts to less than 20%. Authors should before submitting a journal manuscript to check for similarity independently first.
Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim (Journal of Maritime Technology) checks the submitted journal manuscripts regarding the spelling of the letters and words of the manuscript using the GRAMMARLY.
Authors should before sending scientific papers to Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim (Journal of Maritime Technology) to check the spelling of words and letters first.
Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim (Journal of Maritime Technology) using a reference or citation application reference management such as MENDELEY. Authors should use a reference or citation application reference management for journal manuscripts sent to Wave: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Maritim (Journal of Maritime Technology).